Difference between revisions of "OpenMP in Small Bites/Worksharing"
OpenMP in Small Bites/Worksharing
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|type="()"} | |type="()"} | ||
+ Click and submit to see the answer | + Click and submit to see the answer | ||
| − | || <code> int i, int s = 0; <br /> for (i = 1; i < 100; i++){ </code> <div style="margin-left: 1em;"><code> s = a[i-1] + a[i]; </code></div> <code>} </code> <br /> | + | || <code> int i, int s = 0; <br /> for (i = 1; i < 100; i++){ </code> <div style="margin-left: 1em;"><code> s = a[i-1] + a[i]; </code></div> <code>} </code> <br /> {{Note|'''Due to the depency between the loop iterations this would cause a data race)'''}} |
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
{{hidden end}} | {{hidden end}} | ||
Revision as of 19:18, 30 October 2020
| HPC.NRW | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Other HPC Courses | |
| 1. | Gprof Tutorial |
| 2. | Introduction to Linux in HPC |
| OpenMP in Small Bites | |
| 1. | Overview |
| 2. | Worksharing |
| 3. | Data Scoping |
| 4. | Non-Uniform Memory Access
|
Video
Quiz
1. What is most commenly used worksharing construct in OpenMP to distribute work among loop interations?
2. Give an example for a parallel vector addition using OpenMP worksharing!
3. Can the following code snipped be parallelized with the OpenMP for-construct with out breaking the semantic? Justify your answer.